Egerov's Theorem/Bounded Convergence Theorem: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
Since <math> \epsilon </math> was arbitrary and <math> \mu(E)+2M </math> is finite by assumption we are done.
Since <math> \epsilon </math> was arbitrary and <math> \mu(E)+2M </math> is finite by assumption we are done.


Note this theorem could also easily be proved using dominated convergence theorem with dominating function <math> g=M \mathbf{1}_E <\math>, but traditionally one proves bounded convergence before dominating convergence.
Note this theorem could also easily be proved using dominated convergence theorem with dominating function <math> g=M\cdot \mathbf{1}_E </math>, but traditionally one proves bounded convergence before dominating convergence.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 01:16, 8 December 2020

Statement

Egerov's Theorem : Suppose is a locally finite Borel measure and is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set with and a.e. on E.

Then: Given we may find a closed subset such that and uniformly on [1]

Proof

WLOG assume for all since the set of points at which is a null set. Fix and for we define . Since are measurable so is their difference. Then since the absolute value of a measurable function is measurable each is measurable.

Now for fixed we have that and . Therefore using continuity from below we may find a such that . Now choose so that and define . By countable subadditivity we have that .

Fix any . We choose such that . Since if then . And by definition if then whenever . Hence uniformly on .

Finally, since is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set such that . Therefore and on


Corollary

Bounded Convergence Theorem : Let be a seqeunce of measurable functions bounded by , supported on a set with finite measure and a.e. Then

[2]

Proof

By assumptions on , is measurable, bounded, supported on for a.e. . Fix , then by Egerov we may find a measurable subset of such that and uniformly on . Therefore, for sufficiently large we have that for all . Putting this together yields

Since was arbitrary and is finite by assumption we are done.

Note this theorem could also easily be proved using dominated convergence theorem with dominating function , but traditionally one proves bounded convergence before dominating convergence.

References

  1. Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 1 §4.3
  2. Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 2 § 1