|
|
Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| Since <math> \epsilon </math> was arbitrary and <math> \mu(E)+2M </math> is finite by assumption we are done. | | Since <math> \epsilon </math> was arbitrary and <math> \mu(E)+2M </math> is finite by assumption we are done. |
|
| |
|
| Note this theorem could also easily be proved using dominated convergence theorem with dominating function <math> g=M \mathbf{1}_E <\math>, but traditionally one proves bounded convergence before dominating convergence. | | Note this theorem could also easily be proved using dominated convergence theorem with dominating function <math> g=M\cdot \mathbf{1}_E </math>, but traditionally one proves bounded convergence before dominating convergence. |
|
| |
|
| ==References== | | ==References== |
Revision as of 01:16, 8 December 2020
Statement
Egerov's Theorem : Suppose
is a locally finite Borel measure and
is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set
with
and
a.e. on E.
Then:
Given
we may find a closed subset
such that
and
uniformly on
[1]
Proof
WLOG assume
for all
since the set of points at which
is a null set. Fix
and for
we define
. Since
are measurable so is their difference. Then since the absolute value of a measurable function is measurable each
is measurable.
Now for fixed
we have that
and
. Therefore using continuity from below we may find a
such that
.
Now choose
so that
and define
. By countable subadditivity we have that
.
Fix any
. We choose
such that
. Since
if
then
. And by definition if
then
whenever
. Hence
uniformly on
.
Finally, since
is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set
such that
. Therefore
and
on
Corollary
Bounded Convergence Theorem : Let
be a seqeunce of measurable functions bounded by
, supported on a set
with finite measure and
a.e. Then
[2]
Proof
By assumptions on
,
is measurable, bounded, supported on
for a.e.
. Fix
, then by Egerov we may find a measurable subset
of
such that
and
uniformly on
. Therefore, for sufficiently large
we have that
for all
. Putting this together yields
Since
was arbitrary and
is finite by assumption we are done.
Note this theorem could also easily be proved using dominated convergence theorem with dominating function
, but traditionally one proves bounded convergence before dominating convergence.
References
- ↑ Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 1 §4.3
- ↑ Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 2 § 1