|
|
Line 23: |
Line 23: |
|
| |
|
| ==Proof== | | ==Proof== |
| By assumptions on <math> f_n</math>, <math>f </math> is measurable, bounded, supported on <math>E </math> for a.e. x. Fix <math>\epsilon>0 </math>, then by Egerov we may find a measurable subset <math>A_\epsilon </math> of <math> E</math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)<\epsilon </math> and <math>f_n\to f </math> uniformly on <math>A_\epsilon </math>. Therefore, for sufficiently large <math>n </math> we have that <math>|f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon </math> for all <math>x\in A_\epsilon </math>. Putting this together yields | | By assumptions on <math> f_n</math>, <math>f </math> is measurable, bounded, supported on <math>E </math> for a.e. <math>x</math>. Fix <math>\epsilon>0 </math>, then by Egerov we may find a measurable subset <math>A_\epsilon </math> of <math> E</math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)<\epsilon </math> and <math>f_n\to f </math> uniformly on <math>A_\epsilon </math>. Therefore, for sufficiently large <math>n </math> we have that <math>|f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon </math> for all <math>x\in A_\epsilon </math>. Putting this together yields |
|
| |
|
| <math>\int |f_n-f|=\int_E |f_n-f|=\int_{A_\epsilon} |f_n-f|+\int_{E\setminus A_\epsilon}\leq \epsilon \mu(E)+2M \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)=\epsilon(\mu(E)+2M) </math> | | <math>\int |f_n-f|=\int_E |f_n-f|=\int_{A_\epsilon} |f_n-f|+\int_{E\setminus A_\epsilon}|f_n-f| \leq \epsilon \mu(E)+2M \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)=\epsilon(\mu(E)+2M) </math> |
|
| |
|
| Since <math> \epsilon </math> was arbitrary and <math> \mu(E)+2M </math> is finite by assumption we are done. | | Since <math> \epsilon </math> was arbitrary and <math> \mu(E)+2M </math> is finite by assumption we are done. |
|
| |
|
| ==References== | | ==References== |
Revision as of 21:07, 7 December 2020
Statement
Egerov's Theorem : Suppose
is a locally finite Borel measure and
is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set
with
and
a.e. on E.
Then:
Given
we may find a closed subset
such that
and
uniformly on
[1]
Proof
WLOG assume
for all
since the set of points at which
is a null set. Fix
and for
we define
. Since
are measurable so is their difference. Then since the absolute value of a measurable function is measurable each
is measurable.
Now for fixed
we have that
and
. Therefore using continuity from below we may find a
such that
.
Now choose
so that
and define
. By countable subadditivity we have that
.
Fix any
. We choose
such that
. Since
if
then
. And by definition if
then
whenever
. Hence
uniformly on
.
Finally, since
is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set
such that
. Therefore
and
on
Corollary
Bounded Convergence Theorem : Let
be a seqeunce of measurable functions bounded by
, supported on a set
and
a.e. Then
[2]
Proof
By assumptions on
,
is measurable, bounded, supported on
for a.e.
. Fix
, then by Egerov we may find a measurable subset
of
such that
and
uniformly on
. Therefore, for sufficiently large
we have that
for all
. Putting this together yields
Since
was arbitrary and
is finite by assumption we are done.
References
- ↑ Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 1 §4.3
- ↑ Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 2 § 1