Introduction
In the case that the space
is compact then all continuous functions belongs to
as we will show in the next section. On the other hand if the space
is not compact while we always have the inclusion
there may be some continuous function that do not belong to
. Some of them may even even be bounded and still not belong to
, this motivates us to consider the dual space of
and the dual space of
.
Background and Statement
Let
equipped with the sup norm. In other words this is the space of continuous function vanishing at infinity. Note that in the case
is compact we can choose
in the previous definition, since properties on the empty set are trivially true, we can conclude that
. Let
be the space of bounded continuous functions on
together with the sup norm, Again in the case
is compact we have not introduced a new space since every continuous function on a compact metric space is bounded, to see this assume on the contrary that there is a sequence
such that
as
. I can then extract by compactness a sub sequence
converging to a point
. Therefore by continuity of
we have
, and this is our desired contradiction. We conclude that
.
The rest of this discussion will consider the case where
is not compact. We wont have the last chain of equalities but only the inequalities
The case of 
The representation of the dual space of
is a described by the following well known result in Functional Analysis (Riesz Representation Theorem 6.19 in Rudin [1]):
Let
be a locally compact Hausdorff space, for any bounded linear function
, i.e. an element of the dual space
, there is a unique complex Borel measure
such that the following holds:
.
This allows us to identify
with
, space of complex Borel measures. Moreover we can endow
with the total variation norm:
.
The case of 
To descrive the dual space of
, I will focus my attention to only one property of functions which is the behavior at infinity, Exercise 1.23 of [2]. First we need a preliminary result:
is a closed (vector) subspace of
. In other words
contains all its limit points. Let
be a convergent sequence in
,
are continuous functions vanishing at infinity and let
their limit. f is continuous since the uniform norm we are using provides uniform convergence. It remains to show that such limit
vanishes at infinity: let
be such that
, now since each
vanishes at infinity, we can find
such that
for any
. Then we can conclude by triangle inequality that
,
That is,
. I will now need to carefully specify the local property at infinity for
.
We say that a function
admits a limit at infinity
if for any
there exists a compact
such that if
implies
. We can see this operation as a linear function 'limit at infinity' thanks to Hahn-Banach we can build a continuous extension of it for all
. This is another spectacular consequence of Axiom of Choice (Hahn-Banach theorem [1] in this case) since the extension assign a limit to any continuous bounded function! Intuitively we can partition the space
into equivalence classes of the equivalence relation of having the same limit at infinity. Then thanks to the axiom of choice choose a representative for each class. The problem with this argument that we don't know yet that every functions in
admits such limit. But this will not stop us from falling down the rabbit hole: Note that every function in
admit such limit, let
,
Since the functions vanishes at infinity this operation of assigning limit at infinity is clearly a linear map. It's not hard to see that
, i.e. a bounded linear operator on
. We showed before that
is a closed (vector) subspace of
therefore we can extend
to the whole
using the formulation of Hahn Banach Theorem for normed spaces. Let
be such extension,
and
on
. Note that this functional is supported at infinity, in the sense that for any
then
.
Kantorovich Duality for 
As it can be found in Villani, Proposition 1.22 [3] also [2], the following version of Kantorovich duality holds: let
and
locally compact Polish spaces, let
be a lower semi-continuous non negative function on
and let
and
be two Borel probability measures on
respectively then:
,
Here
is the set of all probability measures
that satisfies
and
for any measurable set
and any measurable set
;
is the set of all measurable functions
that satisfies
for
almost all
and for
almost all
.
As mentioned in Villani Section 1.3 pag. 39[4], if we try to extend the proof of the compact case we run into a problem since the dual of
strictly contains
. If we restrict to the closed subspace
than any elements
acts continuously, as mentioned before, can be represented by a unique
such that
.
We can then write
where
is a continuous linear functional supported at infinity, i.e.
implies
.
For what discussed in the previous section the behavior of some
may not be clear at first glance as the following result showed in exercise 1.23 of [5].
Let
and
be two Borel probability measures on
respectively, there is a continuous linear functional
on
, supported at infinity, such that the following holds
.
To prove this we want to apply what we have seen in the previous section, lets consider the function
, for fixed
we can see this function as a function of
i,e, let
. Noticing that
, we can assign a limit at infinity
to
and then extend it to all
following the construction of
in the precious section. Similarly we will do the same by considering for any fixed
the function
as a function of
. Note that such extension is supported at infinity! This will allow me to first write the two functions:
.
Since we are only considering functions that vanishing at infinity we can conclude that our
and
satisfy the following:
.
Where
, with a slightly abuse of notation, is the simultaneously assignment of limit at infinity in
and
. The simultaneously extension
, again with a little abuse of notation, will be a bounded linear functional on
will satisfy
- ↑ Rudin, Walter. Real and Complex Analysis, 1966.
- ↑ Villani, Cedric. Topics In Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.
- ↑ Villani, Cedric. Topics In Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.
- ↑ Villani, Cedric. Topics In Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.
- ↑ Villani, Cedric. Topics In Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.