Introduction
In the case that the space is compact then all continuous functions belongs to as we will show in the next section. On the other hand if the space is not compact while we always have the inclusion there may be some continuous function that do not belong to . Some of them may even even be bounded and still not belong to , this motivates us to consider the dual space of and the dual space of .
Background and Statement
Let equipped with the sup norm. In other words this is the space of continuous function vanishing at infinity. Note that in the case is compact we can choose in the previous definition, since properties on the empty set are trivially true, we can conclude that . Let be the space of bounded continuous functions on together with the sup norm, Again in the case is compact we have not introduced a new space since every continuous function on a compact metric space is bounded, to see this assume on the contrary that there is a sequence such that as . I can then extract by compactness a sub sequence converging to a point . Therefore by continuity of we have , and this is our desired contradiction. We conclude that .
The rest of this discussion will consider the case where is not compact. We wont have the last chain of equalities but only the inequalities
The case of
The representation of the dual space of is a described by the following well known result in Functional Analysis (Riesz Representation Theorem 6.19 in Rudin [1]):
Let be a locally compact Hausdorff space, for any bounded linear function , i.e. an element of the dual space , there is a unique complex Borel measure such that the following holds:
- .
This allows us to identify with , space of complex Borel measures. Moreover we can endow with the total variation norm: .
The case of
To descrive the dual space of , I will focus my attention to only one property of functions which is the behavior at infinity, Exercise 1.23 of [2]. First we need a preliminary result: is a closed (vector) subspace of . In other words contains all its limit points. Let be a convergent sequence in , are continuous functions vanishing at infinity and let their limit. f is continuous since the uniform norm we are using provides uniform convergence. It remains to show that such limit vanishes at infinity: let be such that , now since each vanishes at infinity, we can find such that for any . Then we can conclude by triangle inequality that
- ,
That is, . I will now need to carefully specify the local property at infinity for .
We say that a function admits a limit at infinity if for any there exists a compact such that if implies . We can see this operation as a linear function 'limit at infinity' thanks to Hahn-Banach we can build a continuous extension of it for all . This is another spectacular consequence of Axiom of Choice (Hahn-Banach theorem [1] in this case) since the extension assign a limit to any continuous bounded function! Intuitively we can partition the space into equivalence classes of the equivalence relation of having the same limit at infinity. Then thanks to the axiom of choice choose a representative for each class. The problem with this argument that we don't know yet that every functions in admits such limit. But this will not stop us from falling down the rabbit hole: Note that every function in admit such limit, let
- ,
Since the functions vanishes at infinity this operation of assigning limit at infinity is clearly a linear map. It's not hard to see that , i.e. a bounded linear operator on . We showed before that is a closed (vector) subspace of therefore we can extend to the whole using the formulation of Hahn Banach Theorem for normed spaces. Let be such extension, and on . Note that this functional is supported at infinity, in the sense that for any then .
Kantorovich Duality for
As it can be found in Villani, Proposition 1.22 [3] also [2], the following version of Kantorovich duality holds: let and locally compact Polish spaces, let be a lower semi-continuous non negative function on and let and be two Borel probability measures on respectively then:
- ,
Here is the set of all probability measures that satisfies and for any measurable set and any measurable set ; is the set of all measurable functions that satisfies for almost all and for almost all .
If we try to extend the proof of the compact case we run into a problem since the dual of strictly contains . If we restrict to the closed subspace than any elements acts continuously, and mentioned before, can be represented by a unique such that
- .
We can then write where is a continuous linear functional supported at infinity, i.e. implies .
For what discussed in the previous section the behavior of some may not be clear at first glance as the following result implies:
let and be two Borel probability measures on respectively, there is a continuous linear functional on , supported at infinity, such that the following holds
- .
Because
- ↑ Rudin, Walter. Real and Complex Analysis, 1966.
- ↑ Villani, Cedric. Topics In Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.
- ↑ Villani, Cedric. Topics In Optimal Transportation. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.