Talk:Kantorovich Problem: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Kantorovich Discussion)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
test
==Beginning==
* Instead of ``The Kantorovich's ot problem``, just ``Kantorovich's ot problem``
* ``Leonid Kantorovich, the founder of modern optimization, who was awarded a Nobel...'
* Change the phrase ``Leonid Kantorovich`` to a link to his wikipedia page
* Add a link to Nobel prize: [[https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1975/press-release/]]
 
==Introduction==
* ``beside THE Monge Problem``
* change the phrase ``Monge Problem`` to a link to the OT wiki page.
* While everything you say in the introduction is correct, it seems a little early to get into this level of technicality. Why not you move this section to the bottom and rename it ``Comparison to Monge Problem``?
* Instead, your introduction can give an heuristic interpretation of the problem, in terms of ``moving around piles of dirt``, which would be understandable to a non-mathematician. You can end the introduction with  statement of Kantorovich's OT problem, rather than having this in its own separate section.
* You will need to define what you mean by <math> \Pi(\mu,\nu) </math>
 
==References==
* There is an error in the references

Revision as of 22:08, 13 May 2020

Beginning

  • Instead of ``The Kantorovich's ot problem``, just ``Kantorovich's ot problem``
  • ``Leonid Kantorovich, the founder of modern optimization, who was awarded a Nobel...'
  • Change the phrase ``Leonid Kantorovich`` to a link to his wikipedia page
  • Add a link to Nobel prize: [[1]]

Introduction

  • ``beside THE Monge Problem``
  • change the phrase ``Monge Problem`` to a link to the OT wiki page.
  • While everything you say in the introduction is correct, it seems a little early to get into this level of technicality. Why not you move this section to the bottom and rename it ``Comparison to Monge Problem``?
  • Instead, your introduction can give an heuristic interpretation of the problem, in terms of ``moving around piles of dirt``, which would be understandable to a non-mathematician. You can end the introduction with statement of Kantorovich's OT problem, rather than having this in its own separate section.
  • You will need to define what you mean by

References

  • There is an error in the references