Optimal Transport in One Dimension: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:


where <math> F^{-1}</math> and <math> G^{-1}</math> are the pseudo-inverses of the respective CDFs.
where <math> F^{-1}</math> and <math> G^{-1}</math> are the pseudo-inverses of the respective CDFs.
===Ideas used in the proof===

Revision as of 06:07, 12 February 2022

In this article, we explore the optimal transport problem on the real line along with some examples.

Linear Cost Example

For this example, consider the cost function along with a given linear map . Moreover, if let be any transport plan, then by direct computation we see that

                                                                                

which suggests that this result only depends on the marginals of (wherein and are compactly supported probability measures). In fact, in such cases, every transport plan/map is optimal.

Distance Cost Example

Consider the cost function along with probability measures (on ) and . Then, for any we see that , which then immediately puts us back in the linear cost position, so any transport map/plan is also optimal for such costs.

Book Shifting Example

Consider the cost function along with and (where is the one-dimensional Lebesgue measure). A (monotone) transport plan that rearranges to look like is given by and its corresponding cost is

                                                                                               .

Furthermore, notice that the piecewise map given by (for ) and (for ) satisfies , i.e. is a transport map from to ; moreover, the corresponding cost is

                                                                                          

and so we conclude that is indeed optimal as well.


Quadratic Cost

Theorem: Let be probability measures on with cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) and , respectively. Also, let be the probability measure on with the CDF . Then, and is optimal (in the Kantorovich problem setting) between and for the (quadratic) cost function , and the corresponding cost is

                                                                                            

where and are the pseudo-inverses of the respective CDFs.


Ideas used in the proof