|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| The main result is the following: | | The main result is the following: |
| Let </math> E </math> be a Borel measurable set. For every </math>\varepsilon > 0</math> there exists an open set </math> U </math> with </math> E\subset U </math> such that </math> m(E)>m(U)-\varepsilon </math>. Note that this implies </math> 0< m(U)-m(E)<\varepsilon </math> by monotonicity. | | Let <math> E </math> be a Borel measurable set. For every <math>\varepsilon > 0</math> there exists an open set <math> U </math> with <math> E\subset U </math> such that <math> m(E)>m(U)-\varepsilon </math>. Note that this implies <math> 0< m(U)-m(E)<\varepsilon </math> by monotonicity. |
|
| |
|
| Proof: First suppose </math> E </math> is bounded. If </math> E </math> is also closed, then we're done; </math> E </math> is compact. Otherwise, the boundary </math> \partial{E}=\overline{E}\backslash E </math> is nonempty. Now, </math> \partial{E} </math> is a Borel measurable set, so we can approximate it from above by the previous section. That is, there exists an open set </math> U\supset \partial{E} </math> such that </math> m(U) < m(\overline{E}\backslash E) +\varepsilon = \varepsilon </math>. Now define </math> K= \overline{E} \backslash U </math>. By construction, this set is contained in </math> U </math>. Moreover, it is closed, being the intersection of two closed sets. Finally, </math> K </math> is bounded because </math> E </math> is bounded. By the Heine-Borel Theorem, </math> K </math> is compact, and </math> K </math> satisfies the constraints of the theorem because <math display = "block"> m(K)=m(\overline{E} \backslash U) = m(E)- M(E\cap U) = m(E)-m(U)+m(U/E) \geq m(E)-m(U)+m(\overline{E} \backslash E) \geq m(E)-\varepsilon </math> | | Proof: First suppose <math> E </math> is bounded. If <math> E </math> is also closed, then we're done; <math> E </math> is compact. Otherwise, the boundary <math> \partial{E}=\overline{E}\backslash E </math> is nonempty. Now, <math> \partial{E} </math> is a Borel measurable set, so we can approximate it from above by the previous section. That is, there exists an open set <math> U\supset \partial{E} </math> such that <math> m(U) < m(\overline{E}\backslash E) +\varepsilon = \varepsilon </math>. Now define <math> K= \overline{E} \backslash U </math>. By construction, this set is contained in <math> U </math>. Moreover, it is closed, being the intersection of two closed sets. Finally, <math> K </math> is bounded because <math> E </math> is bounded. By the Heine-Borel Theorem, <math> K </math> is compact, and <math> K </math> satisfies the constraints of the theorem because <math display = "block"> m(K)=m(\overline{E} \backslash U) = m(E)- M(E\cap U) = m(E)-m(U)+m(U/E) \geq m(E)-m(U)+m(\overline{E} \backslash E) \geq m(E)-\varepsilon </math> |
| Now assume </math> E </math> is unbounded. Let </math> E_j = E \cap [j, j+1) </math>. By the preceding argument, for each </math> \varepsilon > 0 </math> there exist compact </math> K_j </math> such that </math> K_j \subset E_j </math> and </math> m(K_j) > m(E_j)-\varepsilon / 2^k </math>. Let </math> H_n = \bigcup_{j=-n}^{n} K_j </math>. Then </math> H_n </math> is compact and </math> m(H_n) \geq m(\bigcup_{j=-n}^n E_j) + \varepsilon </math>, and since </math> \lim_{n\to\infty} m(E)=m(\bigcup_{j=-n}^n E_j) </math>, the result follows.<ref name="Folland">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §2.3 </ref> | | Now assume <math> E </math> is unbounded. Let <math> E_j = E \cap [j, j+1) </math>. By the preceding argument, for each <math> \varepsilon > 0 </math> there exist compact <math> K_j </math> such that <math> K_j \subset E_j </math> and <math> m(K_j) > m(E_j)-\varepsilon / 2^k </math>. Let <math> H_n = \bigcup_{j=-n}^{n} K_j </math>. Then <math> H_n </math> is compact and <math> m(H_n) \geq m(\bigcup_{j=-n}^n E_j) + \varepsilon </math>, and since <math> \lim_{n\to\infty} m(E)=m(\bigcup_{j=-n}^n E_j) </math>, the result follows.<ref name="Folland">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §1.5 </ref> |
|
| |
|
| ==Littlewood's First Principle== | | ==Littlewood's First Principle== |
|
| |
|
| The previous two results imply the following formulation of Littlewood's First Principle: | | The previous two results imply the following formulation of Littlewood's First Principle: |
| If </math> E </math> is a Borel measurable set and </math> m(E)<+\infty </math>, then for every </math> \varepsilon > 0</math> there is a set </math> A </math> that is a finite union of open intervals such that </math> m(A\delta E) < \varepsilon </math>, where </math> \delta </math> denotes symmetric difference. | | If <math> E </math> is a Borel measurable set and <math> m(E)<+\infty </math>, then for every <math> \varepsilon > 0</math> there is a set <math> A </math> that is a finite union of open intervals such that <math> m(A\delta E) < \varepsilon </math>, where <math> \delta </math> denotes symmetric difference. |
|
| |
|
| Proof: Using the previous two sections find </math> K </math> and </math> U </math> such that </math> K\subset E \subset U </math> and </math> m(E)-\epsilon < m(K) </math> and </math> m(E)+\epsilon > m(U) </math>. As noted in the proof of the first section, </math> U </math> is really a countable union of open intervals. These intervals form an open cover for </math> K </math> and since </math> K </math> is compact, only finitely many cover </math> K </math>. Defining </math> A </math> to be the union of these finitely many intervals, the result follows, since </math> m(A/E) \leq m(U/E) </math> and </math> m(E/A) \leq m(E/K) </math>. | | Proof: Using the previous two sections find <math> K </math> and <math> U </math> such that <math> K\subset E \subset U </math> and <math> m(E)-\epsilon < m(K) </math> and <math> m(E)+\epsilon > m(U) </math>. As noted in the proof of the first section, <math> U </math> is really a countable union of open intervals. These intervals form an open cover for <math> K </math> and since <math> K </math> is compact, only finitely many cover <math> K </math>. Defining <math> A </math> to be the union of these finitely many intervals, the result follows, since <math> m(A/E) \leq m(U/E) </math> and <math> m(E/A) \leq m(E/K) </math>. |
|
| |
|
| ==References== | | ==References== |
Revision as of 23:11, 19 December 2020
Littlewood stated the principles in his 1944 Lectures on the Theory of Functions [1]:
There are three principles, roughly expressible in the following terms: Every (measurable) set is nearly a finite sum of intervals; every function (of class Lp) is nearly continuous; every convergent sequence of functions is nearly uniformly convergent.}}
This article examines the first principle and attempts to divine how restrictive the constraint of (Borel) measurability truly is for a set. This will be done in the form of two important results; namely, showing how well such a set can be approximated from above by open sets and how well such a set can be approximated from below by compact sets.
These two results will demonstrate how convenient Borel measurable sets are to work with and how one may more easily prove results about them by using this approximation and passing to the limit by continuity argument.
Approximation by Open Sets
The main result is the following:
Let
be a Borel measurable set. For every
there exists a compact set
with
such that
. Note that this implies
by monotonicity.
Proof: By construction of the Borel measure, there exists a sequence of intervals
such that
and

Taking

gives the result.
[2]
Approximation by Compact Sets
The main result is the following:
Let
be a Borel measurable set. For every
there exists an open set
with
such that
. Note that this implies
by monotonicity.
Proof: First suppose
is bounded. If
is also closed, then we're done;
is compact. Otherwise, the boundary
is nonempty. Now,
is a Borel measurable set, so we can approximate it from above by the previous section. That is, there exists an open set
such that
. Now define
. By construction, this set is contained in
. Moreover, it is closed, being the intersection of two closed sets. Finally,
is bounded because
is bounded. By the Heine-Borel Theorem,
is compact, and
satisfies the constraints of the theorem because

Now assume

is unbounded. Let

. By the preceding argument, for each

there exist compact

such that

and

. Let

. Then

is compact and

, and since

, the result follows.
[2]
Littlewood's First Principle
The previous two results imply the following formulation of Littlewood's First Principle:
If
is a Borel measurable set and
, then for every
there is a set
that is a finite union of open intervals such that
, where
denotes symmetric difference.
Proof: Using the previous two sections find
and
such that
and
and
. As noted in the proof of the first section,
is really a countable union of open intervals. These intervals form an open cover for
and since
is compact, only finitely many cover
. Defining
to be the union of these finitely many intervals, the result follows, since
and
.
References
- ↑ Littlewood, J. E. Lectures on the Theory of Functions. Oxford University Press, 1944.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "Folland" defined multiple times with different content