Absolutely Continuous Measures: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
Recall that if <math> f:X\rightarrow [0,\infty]</math> is a [[Measurable_function|measurable function]], then the set function <math> \mu_2(T) = \int_{T} f \,d\mu_1</math> for <math> T\in \mathcal{M}</math> is a measure on <math> (X,\mathcal{M},\mu_1) </math>. Observe that if <math> \mu_1(T) = 0</math>, then <math> \mu_2(T) = \int_{X} f\cdot \ | Recall that if <math> f:X\rightarrow [0,\infty]</math> is a [[Measurable_function|measurable function]], then the set function <math> \mu_2(T) = \int_{T} f \,d\mu_1</math> for <math> T\in \mathcal{M}</math> is a measure on <math> (X,\mathcal{M},\mu_1) </math>. Observe that if <math> \mu_1(T) = 0</math>, then <math> \mu_2(T) = \int_{X} f\cdot \mathbbm{1}_T \,d\mu_1 = 0</math> so that <math> \mu_2 \ll \mu_1 </math> (see [3] for further details on this example and others). | ||
==Properties== | ==Properties== | ||
It was previously established on a homework problem that for some nonnegative measurable <math> f\in L^1(\mu_1)</math> defined on the measure space <math> (X,\mathcal{M},\mu_1) </math> and some arbitrarily chosen <math> \epsilon > 0</math>, there exists <math> \delta > 0 </math> such that <math> \int_{T} f \,d\mu_1 < \epsilon</math> whenever <math> \mu_1(T) < \delta</math> (see [2]). The method that was used to establish this result can also be used to show that, in a finite measure space, if <math> \mu_2 \ll \mu_1</math>, then for some arbitrarily chosen <math> \epsilon > 0</math>, there exists <math> \delta > 0 </math> such that <math> \mu_1(T) < \delta \implies \mu_2(T) < \epsilon </math>. | It was previously established on a homework problem that for some nonnegative measurable <math> f\in L^1(\mu_1)</math> defined on the measure space <math> (X,\mathcal{M},\mu_1) </math> and some arbitrarily chosen <math> \epsilon > 0</math>, there exists <math> \delta > 0 </math> such that <math> \int_{T} f \,d\mu_1 < \epsilon</math> whenever <math> \mu_1(T) < \delta</math> (see [2]). The method that was used to establish this result can also be used to show that, in a finite measure space, if <math> \mu_2 \ll \mu_1</math>, then for some arbitrarily chosen <math> \epsilon > 0</math>, there exists <math> \delta > 0 </math> such that <math> \mu_1(T) < \delta \implies \mu_2(T) < \epsilon </math>. |
Revision as of 18:38, 19 December 2020
Definitions
Let be a measure space. The measure is said to be absolutely continuous with respect to the measure if we have that for such that (see [1]). In this case, we denote that is absolutely continuous with respect to by writing .
Examples
Recall that if is a measurable function, then the set function for is a measure on . Observe that if , then Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \mu_2(T) = \int_{X} f\cdot \mathbbm{1}_T \,d\mu_1 = 0} so that (see [3] for further details on this example and others).
Properties
It was previously established on a homework problem that for some nonnegative measurable defined on the measure space and some arbitrarily chosen , there exists such that whenever (see [2]). The method that was used to establish this result can also be used to show that, in a finite measure space, if , then for some arbitrarily chosen , there exists such that .
- In particular, we proceed by contradiction and suppose there exists so that for any and , we have . Now, define a sequence of sets such that and denote where . We have from countable subadditivity that . We have from monotonicity that . The monotonicity of the measure implies that . Applying continuity from above to , we also have . However, this contradicts the definition of .
In fact, the converse to the above result also holds (see [3]). Namely, if we have that there exists so that , then . Suppose that for some . Then, for any such as in the preceding claim, we have . Since can be taken to be arbitrarily small, we have that , as required for the measure to be absolutely continuous with respect to .
References
[1]: Taylor, M. "Measure Theory and Integration". 50-51.
[2]: Craig, K. "Math 201a: Homework 8". Fall 2020. Refer to question 2.
[3]: Rana, I. K. "Introduction to Measure and Integration". Second Edition. 311-313.