Caratheodory's Theorem: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
First, observe that <math>\mathcal{M}</math> is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of <math> \mu </math>-measurability. Now, we show if <math> A, B </math> then <math> A \cup B \in \mathcal{M} </math>.  
First, observe that <math>\mathcal{M}</math> is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of <math> \mu </math>-measurability. Now, we show if <math> A, B </math> then <math> A \cup B \in \mathcal{M} </math>.  


Suppoe <math>E \subseteq X </math>. Then
Suppose <math>E \subseteq X </math>. Then


<math> \mu^*(E) = \mu^*(E \cap A) = \mu^*(E \cap A^c) </math>
<math> \mu^*(E) = \mu^*(E \cap A) = \mu^*(E \cap A^c) </math>
Line 20: Line 20:


<math> \geq \mu^*(E \cap A^c \cap B^c) + \mu^*(E \cap (A \cup B)) </math>
<math> \geq \mu^*(E \cap A^c \cap B^c) + \mu^*(E \cap (A \cup B)) </math>
But certainly, since <math> E \subseteq ( E\cap(A \cup B) ) \cup (E \cap (A \cup B)^c) </math> the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude
<math> E = </math>

Revision as of 22:40, 16 December 2020

Statement

Consider an out measure on . Define

.

Then is a -algebra and is a measure on .

Proof

First, observe that is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of -measurability. Now, we show if then .

Suppose . Then

and by subadditivity

But certainly, since the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude