Egerov's Theorem: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
WLOG assume <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> for all <math> x \in E </math> since the set of points at which <math>f_n \rightarrow f</math> is a null set. Fix <math>\epsilon>0 </math> and for <math> n, k \in \N </math> we define
WLOG assume <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> for all <math> x \in E </math> since the set of points at which <math>f_n \rightarrow f</math> is a null set. Fix <math>\epsilon>0 </math> and for <math> n, k \in \N </math> we define
<math> E_k^n=\{x \in E: |f_j(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{n} \text{  for all  } j>k\} </math>. Since <math>f_n,f </math> are measurable so is their difference. Then since the absolute value of a measurable function is measurable each <math>E_k^n </math> is measurable.  
<math> E_k^n=\{x \in E: |f_j(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{n} \text{  for all  } j>k\} </math>. Since <math>f_n,f </math> are measurable so is their difference. Then since the absolute value of a measurable function is measurable each <math>E_k^n </math> is measurable.  
Now for fixed <math> n </math> we have that <math> E_{k}^n\subset E_{k+1}^n </math> and <math>E_k^n \nearrow E </math>. Therefore using continuity from below we may find a <math> k_n </math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus E_{k_n}^n)<\frac{1}{2^n} </math>.
Now for fixed <math> n </math> we have that <math> E_{k}^n\subset E_{k+1}^n </math> and <math>E_k^n \nearrow E </math>. Therefore using continuity from below we may find a <math> k_n </math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus E_{k_n}^n)<\frac{1}{2^n} </math>.
Now choose <math>N </math> so that <math>\sum_{n=N}^\infty 2^{-n}<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math> and define <math> \tilde{A}_\epsilon=\bigcap_{n\geq N} E_{k_n}^n </math>. By countable subadditivity we have that <math>\mu(E\setminus \tilde{A}_\epsilon)\leq \sum_{n=N}^\infty \mu(E-E_{k_n}^n)<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math>.
Now choose <math>N </math> so that <math>\sum_{n=N}^\infty 2^{-n}<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math> and define <math> \tilde{A}_\epsilon=\bigcap_{n\geq N} E_{k_n}^n </math>. By countable subadditivity we have that <math>\mu(E\setminus \tilde{A}_\epsilon)\leq \sum_{n=N}^\infty \mu(E-E_{k_n}^n)<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math>.


Now fix any <math> \delta>0 </math>. We choose <math> n\geq N</math> such that <math>\frac{1}{n}\leq \delta </math>. Since <math> n \geq N </math> if <math> x \in \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> then <math> x \in E_{k_n}^n </math>. And by definition if <math>x \in E_{k_n}^n </math> then <math>|f_j(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{n}<\delta </math> whenever <math> j > k_n </math>. Hence <math> f_n \rightarrow f</math> uniformly on <math> \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math>.
Fix any <math> \delta>0 </math>. We choose <math> n\geq N</math> such that <math>\frac{1}{n}\leq \delta </math>. Since <math> n \geq N </math> if <math> x \in \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> then <math> x \in E_{k_n}^n </math>. And by definition if <math>x \in E_{k_n}^n </math> then <math>|f_j(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{n}<\delta </math> whenever <math> j > k_n </math>. Hence <math> f_n \rightarrow f</math> uniformly on <math> \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math>.


Finally, since <math>\tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set <math>A_\epsilon\subset \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> such that <math>\mu(\tilde{A}_\epsilon\setminus A_\epsilon)<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math>. Therefore <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)<\epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> on <math> A_\epsilon </math>
Finally, since <math>\tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set <math>A_\epsilon\subset \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> such that <math>\mu(\tilde{A}_\epsilon\setminus A_\epsilon)<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math>. Therefore <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)<\epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> on <math> A_\epsilon </math>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 09:49, 7 December 2020

Statement

Suppose is a locally finite Borel measure and is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set with and a.e. on E.

Then: Given we may find a closed subset such that and uniformly on [1]

Proof

WLOG assume for all since the set of points at which is a null set. Fix and for we define . Since are measurable so is their difference. Then since the absolute value of a measurable function is measurable each is measurable.

Now for fixed we have that and . Therefore using continuity from below we may find a such that . Now choose so that and define . By countable subadditivity we have that .

Fix any . We choose such that . Since if then . And by definition if then whenever . Hence uniformly on .

Finally, since is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set such that . Therefore and on

References

  1. Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 1 §4.3