Egerov's Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math>\{f_n\}</math> is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set <math> E </math> with <math> \mu(E)<\infty </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> a.e. on E. | Suppose <math>\{f_n\}</math> is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set <math> E </math> with <math> \mu(E)<\infty </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> a.e. on E. | ||
Then: | Then: | ||
Given <math> \epsilon>0 </math> we may find a closed subset <math> A_\epsilon \subset E </math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon \leq \epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> uniformly on <math> A_\epsilon </math> | Given <math> \epsilon>0 </math> we may find a closed subset <math> A_\epsilon \subset E </math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon \leq \epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> uniformly on <math> A_\epsilon </math> |
Revision as of 09:06, 7 December 2020
Statement
Suppose is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set with and a.e. on E.
Then:
Given we may find a closed subset such that and uniformly on
Proof
For any , let .
By definition, . And , so by Monotone Convergence Theorem, .
Furthermore, by definition we have , then .
Since exists, taking of both sides: .