Inner measure: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
UNDER CONSTRUCTION


An inner measure is a function defined on all subsets of a given set, taking values in the extended real number system. It can be thought of as a counterpart to an [[outer measure]]. Whereas outer measures define the "size" of a set via a minimal covering set (from the outside), inner measures define the size of a set by approximating it with a maximal subset (from the inside). Although it is possible to develop measure theory with outer measures alone -- and many modern textbooks do just this -- Henri Lebesgue, in his 1902 thesis "Intégrale, longueur, aire" ("Integral, Length, Area"), used both inner measures and outer measures. It was not until Constantin Carathéodory made further contributions to the development of measure theory that inner measures were found to be redundant and an alternative notion of a "measurable" set was found.
An inner measure is a function defined on all subsets of a given set, taking values in the extended real number system. It can be thought of as a counterpart to an [[outer measure]]. Whereas outer measures define the "size" of a set via a minimal covering set (from the outside), inner measures define the size of a set by approximating it with a maximal subset (from the inside). Although it is possible to develop measure theory with outer measures alone -- and many modern textbooks do just this -- Henri Lebesgue, in his 1902 thesis "Intégrale, longueur, aire" ("Integral, Length, Area"), used both inner measures and outer measures to construct the foundations of measure theory. It was not until Constantin Carathéodory made further contributions to the development of measure theory that inner measures were found to be redundant and an alternative notion of a "measurable" set was found.


== Definition ==
== Definition ==


Let <math>A \subseteq \mathbb{R}</math> be an open set, and define a function <math>\mu : 2^\mathbb{R} \rightarrow [0, \infty]</math> as follows. If <math>A = \emptyset</math>, then <math>\mu(A) = 0</math>, and if <math>A</math> is unbounded, then <math>\mu(A) = \infty</math>. Otherwise, if <math>A</math> is open, then it can be written as a union of open intervals. Define <math>\mu(I) = b - a</math> for any open interval <math>I = (a,b)</math>, and
Let <math>A \subseteq \mathbb{R}</math> be an open set, and define a function <math>\mu : 2^\mathbb{R} \rightarrow [0, \infty]</math> as follows. If <math>A = \emptyset</math>, then <math>\mu(A) = 0</math>, and if <math>A</math> is unbounded, then <math>\mu(A) = \infty</math>. Otherwise, if <math>A</math> is open, then it can be written as a disjoint union of open intervals. Define <math>\mu(I) = b - a</math> for any open interval <math>I = (a,b)</math>, and


:<math> \mu(A) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \mu(I_k) </math>
:<math> \mu(A) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \mu(I_k) </math>
Line 17: Line 17:
In other words, <math>\mu(B)</math> is the measure of the smallest interval containing <math>B</math>, minus the measure of the complement of <math>B</math> (which is an open set, and hence defined).
In other words, <math>\mu(B)</math> is the measure of the smallest interval containing <math>B</math>, minus the measure of the complement of <math>B</math> (which is an open set, and hence defined).


It is worth noting that this implies a particularly intuitive result, namely
It is worth noting that this implies a particularly nice result, namely


:<math>\mu((a,b)) = \mu(B) + \mu((a,b) \setminus B).</math>
:<math>\mu((a,b)) = \mu(B) + \mu((a,b) \setminus B).</math>
Line 32: Line 32:


=== Inner Measures ===
=== Inner Measures ===
The Lebesgue inner measure of an arbitrary subset <math>A \subseteq \mathbb{R}</math> is defined as
:<math> \mu^*(A) = \sup \{ \mu(F) : F \subseteq A, F \text{ compact} \}. </math>

Revision as of 01:53, 26 October 2020

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

An inner measure is a function defined on all subsets of a given set, taking values in the extended real number system. It can be thought of as a counterpart to an outer measure. Whereas outer measures define the "size" of a set via a minimal covering set (from the outside), inner measures define the size of a set by approximating it with a maximal subset (from the inside). Although it is possible to develop measure theory with outer measures alone -- and many modern textbooks do just this -- Henri Lebesgue, in his 1902 thesis "Intégrale, longueur, aire" ("Integral, Length, Area"), used both inner measures and outer measures to construct the foundations of measure theory. It was not until Constantin Carathéodory made further contributions to the development of measure theory that inner measures were found to be redundant and an alternative notion of a "measurable" set was found.

Definition

Let be an open set, and define a function as follows. If , then , and if is unbounded, then . Otherwise, if is open, then it can be written as a disjoint union of open intervals. Define for any open interval , and

whenever is a disjoint union of open intervals, .

It remains to show how is defined on closed, bounded subsets of (equivalently, compact subsets of , by the Heine-Borel theorem). Let be compact, and suppose is the smallest closed interval containing . Define

In other words, is the measure of the smallest interval containing , minus the measure of the complement of (which is an open set, and hence defined).

It is worth noting that this implies a particularly nice result, namely

Outer Measures

The Lebesgue outer measure is usually defined in terms of open intervals as

Using the function defined above, this can be rewritten in terms of general open sets as

Inner Measures

The Lebesgue inner measure of an arbitrary subset is defined as