Inner measure: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
UNDER CONSTRUCTION | |||
An inner measure is a function defined on all subsets of a given set, taking values in the extended real number system. It can be thought of as a counterpart to an [[outer measure]]. Whereas outer measures define the "size" of a set via a minimal covering set (from the outside), inner measures define the size of a set by approximating it with a maximal subset (from the inside). Although it is possible to develop measure theory with outer measures alone -- and many modern textbooks do just this -- Henri Lebesgue, in his 1902 thesis "Intégrale, longueur, aire" ("Integral, Length, Area"), used both inner measures and outer measures. It was not until Constantin Carathéodory made further contributions to the development of measure theory that inner measures were found to be redundant and an alternative notion of a "measurable" set was found. | An inner measure is a function defined on all subsets of a given set, taking values in the extended real number system. It can be thought of as a counterpart to an [[outer measure]]. Whereas outer measures define the "size" of a set via a minimal covering set (from the outside), inner measures define the size of a set by approximating it with a maximal subset (from the inside). Although it is possible to develop measure theory with outer measures alone -- and many modern textbooks do just this -- Henri Lebesgue, in his 1902 thesis "Intégrale, longueur, aire" ("Integral, Length, Area"), used both inner measures and outer measures. It was not until Constantin Carathéodory made further contributions to the development of measure theory that inner measures were found to be redundant and an alternative notion of a "measurable" set was found. | ||
== Definition == | == Definition == | ||
Let <math>A \subseteq \mathbb{R}</math> be an open set, and define a function <math>\mu : 2^\mathbb{R} \rightarrow [0, \infty]</math> as follows. If <math>A = \emptyset</math>, then <math>\mu(A) = 0</math>, and if <math>A</math> is unbounded, then <math>\mu(A) = \infty</math>. Otherwise, <math>A</math> can be written as a union of open intervals. Define <math>\mu(I) = b - a</math> for any open interval <math>I = (a,b)</math>, and | |||
:<math> \mu | :<math> \mu(A) = \sum_{k=1}^\infty \mu(I_k). </math> | ||
whenever <math>A</math> is a disjoint union of open intervals, <math>A = \cup_{k=1}^\infty I_k</math>. | |||
The Lebesgue outer measure <math>\mu^*</math> is usually defined in terms of open intervals as | |||
:<math> \mu^*(A) = \inf \left\{ \sum_{i=1}^\infty |b_i - a_i| : A \subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^\infty (a_i, b_i) \right\}. </math> | |||
This can be rewritten in terms of general open sets as | |||
:<math> \mu^*(A) = \inf \{ \mu(B) : A \subseteq B, B \text{ open} \}. </math> |
Revision as of 01:26, 26 October 2020
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
An inner measure is a function defined on all subsets of a given set, taking values in the extended real number system. It can be thought of as a counterpart to an outer measure. Whereas outer measures define the "size" of a set via a minimal covering set (from the outside), inner measures define the size of a set by approximating it with a maximal subset (from the inside). Although it is possible to develop measure theory with outer measures alone -- and many modern textbooks do just this -- Henri Lebesgue, in his 1902 thesis "Intégrale, longueur, aire" ("Integral, Length, Area"), used both inner measures and outer measures. It was not until Constantin Carathéodory made further contributions to the development of measure theory that inner measures were found to be redundant and an alternative notion of a "measurable" set was found.
Definition
Let be an open set, and define a function as follows. If , then , and if is unbounded, then . Otherwise, can be written as a union of open intervals. Define for any open interval , and
whenever is a disjoint union of open intervals, .
The Lebesgue outer measure is usually defined in terms of open intervals as
This can be rewritten in terms of general open sets as