Modes of Convergence: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
== Example: <math>f_n \to f</math> in measure does not imply convergence in <math>L^1 <math> == | == Example: <math>f_n \to f</math> in measure does not imply convergence in <math>L^1 <math> == | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 03:57, 19 December 2020
Relevant Definitions[1]
Denote our measure space as . Note that a property p holds for almost every if the set has measure zero.
- A sequence of measurable functions converges pointwise if for all .
- A sequence of measureable functions converges uniformly if .
- A sequence of measurable functions converges to pointwise almost everywhere if for almost every , or .
- A sequence of measurable functions converges in if
check Convergence in Measure for convergence in measure.
Relevant Properties [2]
- through uniform convergence implies through pointwise convergence, which in turn implies pointwise a.e. convergence.
- through convergence implies through pointwise a.e convergence up to a subsequence.
- Pointwise a.e. convergence, equipped with dominating function, implies in . To see the proof and examples of why we need a dominating function, read Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence in Measure lists relationships between convergence in measure and other forms of convergence.
Proof implies in measure
Fix define We can see that that
we can see by convergence that meaning that
or . Hence the proposition follows.
Proof through convergence implies pointwise a.e convergence up to a subsequence.
convergence means in measure. Because in measure, there exists a subsequence such that pointwise a.e.