|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Introduction== | | ==Introduction== |
| Let <math>(X,\mathcal{M},\mu)</math> be a measure space. From our study of integration, we know that if <math> f,g</math> are integrable functions, the following functions are also integrable: | | Let <math>(X,\mathcal{M},\mu)</math> be a measure space. From our study of integration<ref name="Folland">Folland, Gerald B. (1999). ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications'', John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0471317160, Second edition.</ref>, we know that if <math> f,g</math> are integrable functions, the following functions are also integrable: |
|
| |
|
| <ol> | | <ol> |
Revision as of 02:42, 18 December 2020
Introduction
Let be a measure space. From our study of integration[1], we know that if are integrable functions, the following functions are also integrable:
-
- , for
This shows that the set of integrable functions on any measurable space is a vector space. Furthermore, integration is a linear functional on this vector space, ie a linear function sending elements in our vector space to , one would like to use integration to define a norm on our vector space. However, if one were to check the axioms for a norm, one finds integration fails to be a norm by taking almost everywhere, then . In other words, there are non zero functions which has a zero integral. This motivates our definition of to be the set of integrable functions up to equivalence to sets of measure zero.
Space
In this section, we will construct .
Definition
Let denote the set of integrable functions on , ie . Define an equivalence relation: if a.e. Then .
To make sense of the definition, we need the following proposition:
Proposition: Let , then the following are equivalent:
- for all
-
- a.e.
Proof
Since a.e., a.e. Take a simple function, , such that , such must be a.e. Therefore,
Suppose the set does not have measure zero. Then either or has nonzero measure, where denotes and denotes . WLOG, assume has nonzero measure. Define the following sets , then from continuity from below, . This shows that there exists some such that , which implies that , contradicting 1.
With the proposition, we define our norm on to be . This is indeed a norm since:
-
-
- a.e
References
- ↑ Folland, Gerald B. (1999). Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0471317160, Second edition.