Caratheodory's Theorem: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
== Proof ==
== Proof ==


First, observe that <math>\mathcal{M}</math> is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of <math> \mu </math>-measurability. Now, we show if <math> A, B </math> then <math> A \cup B \in \mathcal{M} </math><ref name="Folland"> Folland, Gerald B., ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'' </ref>.  
First, observe that <math>\mathcal{M}</math> is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of <math> \mu </math>-measurability. Now, we show if <math> A, B </math> then <math> A \cup B \in \mathcal{M} </math><ref name="Folland"> Folland, Gerald B., ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §1.4 </ref>.  


Suppose <math>E \subseteq X </math>. Then
Suppose <math>E \subseteq X </math>. Then

Revision as of 23:13, 16 December 2020

Statement

Consider an out measure on . Define

.

Then is a -algebra and is a measure on .

Proof

First, observe that is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of -measurability. Now, we show if then [1].

Suppose . Then

and by subadditivity

But certainly, since the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude

hence and we have is an algebra.


Now, suppose and are disjoint. Then

so is finitely additive.


Next, we show is closed under countable disjoint unions. Given a disjoint sequence of sets , for all , by countable subadditivity,

It remains to show the other inequality direction. Since is closed under finite unions, . By using the definition of -measurability,

and by monotonicity,

Since this holds for all ,

which proves

Similarly as before, the other inequality direction is proved by monotonicity, so we conclude equality and we have that .

The only thing that remains to be shown is closure under countable unions. Consider a sequence of sets not necessarily disjoint. Define

Their unions are equal and is disjoint, hence contained in .

This finishes all parts to the proof.

  1. Folland, Gerald B., Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §1.4