Egerov's Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Then: | Then: | ||
Given <math> \epsilon>0 </math> we may find a closed subset <math> A_\epsilon \subset E </math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon) \leq \epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> uniformly on <math> A_\epsilon </math> <ref name="SS"> Stein & Shakarchi, ''Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces'', §4.3 </ref> | Given <math> \epsilon>0 </math> we may find a closed subset <math> A_\epsilon \subset E </math> such that <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon) \leq \epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> uniformly on <math> A_\epsilon </math> <ref name="SS"> Stein & Shakarchi, ''Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces'', Chapter 1 §4.3 </ref> | ||
==Proof== | ==Proof== |
Revision as of 09:44, 7 December 2020
Statement
Suppose is a locally finite Borel measure and is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set with and a.e. on E.
Then: Given we may find a closed subset such that and uniformly on [1]
Proof
WLOG assume for all since the set of points at which is a null set. Fix and for we define Now for fixed we have that and . Therefore using continuity from below we may find a such that . Now choose so that and define . By countable subadditivity we have that .
Now fix any . We choose such that . Since if then . And by definition if then whenever . Hence uniformly on .
Finally, since is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set such that . Therefore and on
References
- ↑ Stein & Shakarchi, Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces, Chapter 1 §4.3