Egerov's Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Proof) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Suppose <math>\{f_n\}</math> is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set <math> E </math> with <math> \mu(E)<\infty </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> a.e. on E. | Suppose <math> \mu </math> is a locally finite Borel measure and <math>\{f_n\}</math> is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set <math> E </math> with <math> \mu(E)<\infty </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> a.e. on E. | ||
Then: | Then: | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Now fix any <math> \delta>0 </math>. We choose <math> n\geq N</math> such that <math>\frac{1}{n}\leq \delta </math>. Since <math> n \geq N </math> if <math> x \in \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> then <math> x \in E_{k_n}^n </math>. And by definition if <math>x \in E_{k_n}^n </math> then <math>|f_j(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{n}<\delta </math> whenever <math> j > k_n </math>. Hence <math> f_n \rightarrow f</math> uniformly on <math> \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math>. | Now fix any <math> \delta>0 </math>. We choose <math> n\geq N</math> such that <math>\frac{1}{n}\leq \delta </math>. Since <math> n \geq N </math> if <math> x \in \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> then <math> x \in E_{k_n}^n </math>. And by definition if <math>x \in E_{k_n}^n </math> then <math>|f_j(x)-f(x)|<\frac{1}{n}<\delta </math> whenever <math> j > k_n </math>. Hence <math> f_n \rightarrow f</math> uniformly on <math> \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math>. | ||
Finally, | Finally, since <math>\tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set <math>A_\epsilon\subset \tilde{A}_\epsilon </math> such that <math>\mu(\tilde{A}_\epsilon\setminus A_\epsilon)<\frac{\epsilon}{2} </math>. Therefore <math> \mu(E\setminus A_\epsilon)<\epsilon </math> and <math> f_n \rightarrow f </math> on <math> A_\epsilon/math> | ||
< | |||
<math> \ | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 09:38, 7 December 2020
Statement
Suppose is a locally finite Borel measure and is a sequence of measurable functions defined on a measurable set with and a.e. on E.
Then: Given we may find a closed subset such that and uniformly on
Proof
WLOG assume for all since the set of points at which is a null set. Fix and for we define Now for fixed we have that and . Therefore using continuity from below we may find a such that . Now choose so that and define . By countable subadditivity we have that .
Now fix any . We choose such that . Since if then . And by definition if then whenever . Hence uniformly on .
Finally, since is measurable, using HW5 problem 6 there exists a closed set such that . Therefore and on <math> A_\epsilon/math>