Fenchel-Moreau and Primal/Dual Optimization Problems: Difference between revisions

From Optimal Transport Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Fenchel-Moreau Theorem<ref name="Brezis" /> is a fundamental result in convex analysis, characterizing the class of functions for which a function equals its biconjugate. A key consequence of this theorem is the equivalence of ''primal'' and ''dual'' optimization problems.
The Fenchel-Moreau Theorem<ref name="Brezis" /> is a fundamental result in convex analysis, characterizing the class of functions for which a function equals its biconjugate. A key consequence of this theorem is that is provides sufficient conditions for the equivalence of ''primal'' and ''dual'' optimization problems.<ref name="Rockafellar" />


==Fenchel-Moreau Theorem==
==Fenchel-Moreau Theorem==
Line 7: Line 7:


==Background on Convex Conjugate Functions==
==Background on Convex Conjugate Functions==
Let''X'' be a normed vector space, and let ''X*'' denote its topological dual. Given an extended real-valued function <math> f: X \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} </math>, its ''convex conjugate'' <math>f^*:X^* \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\}</math> is defined by  
Let ''X'' be a normed vector space, and let ''X*'' denote its topological dual. Given an extended real-valued function <math> f: X \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} </math>, its ''convex conjugate'' <math>f^*:X^* \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\}</math> is defined by  


:<math> f^*(y):=\sup_{x \in X} \{ \langle y,x \rangle - f(x) \} \quad \forall y \in X^*. </math>
:<math> f^*(y):=\sup_{x \in X} \{ \langle y,x \rangle - f(x) \} \quad \forall y \in X^*. </math>
Line 21: Line 21:
:<math> f^{**}(x):=\sup_{y \in X^*} \{ \langle y,x \rangle - f^*(y) \} \quad \forall y \in X^*. </math>
:<math> f^{**}(x):=\sup_{y \in X^*} \{ \langle y,x \rangle - f^*(y) \} \quad \forall y \in X^*. </math>


As above, for any function ''f'', its biconjugate function ''f**'' is convex and lower semicontinuous. Furthermore, by Young's inequality, we always have
As above, the biconjugate function ''f**'' is always convex and lower semicontinuous. Furthermore, by a second application of Young's inequality, we have


:<math> f^{**}(x) \leq f(x) \quad \forall x \in X. </math>
:<math> f^{**}(x) \leq f(x) \quad \forall x \in X. </math>


Since ''f**'' is always convex and lower semicontinuous, in order for equality to hold, it is necessary for ''f'' to be convex and lower semicontinuous. The heart of Fenchel-Moreau Theorem is that this condition is also sufficient.
Since ''f**'' is always convex and lower semicontinuous, in order for equality to hold for all ''x'', it is necessary that ''f'' also be convex and lower semicontinuous. The heart of Fenchel-Moreau Theorem is that this condition is not just necessary, but sufficient.


==Application to Primal/Dual Optimization Problems==
==Application to Primal/Dual Optimization Problems==
An important consequence of the Fenchel-Moreau Theorem is characterizing the equivalence of the primal and dual optimization problems.<ref name="Rockafellar" /> Given a normed vector space ''X'' and a proper, lower semicontinuous, convex function <math>f: X \to \mathbb{R}\cup \{+\infty\}</math>, the ''primal'' optimization problem is given by
An important consequence of the Fenchel-Moreau Theorem is that it provides sufficient conditions for the equivalence of primal and dual optimization problems. Given a normed vector space ''X'' and a lower semicontinuous, convex function <math>f: X \to \mathbb{R}\cup \{+\infty\}</math>, the ''primal'' optimization problem is given by


:<math> \inf_{x \in X} f(x). </math>
:<math> \inf_{x \in X} f(x). </math>


The corresponding dual problem arises from a suitable ``perturbation" of the primal problem, subject to a parameter ''u'' ∈ ''U'', where ''U'' is also a normed vector space. In particular, let <math> F:X \times U \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} </math> be a proper convex function so that <math> f(x) = F(x,0) </math>. Then the ''primal'' and ''dual'' problems may be written as
The corresponding dual problem arises from a suitable ``perturbation" of the primal problem, subject to a parameter ''u'' ∈ ''U'', where ''U'' is also a normed vector space. In particular, let <math> F:X \times U \to \mathbb{R} \cup \{+\infty\} </math> be a proper convex function so that <math> f(x) = F(x,0) </math>. Then the corresponding ''primal'' and ''dual'' problems may be written as


:<math> P_0 := \inf_{x \in X} F(x,0) </math>
:<math> P_0 := \inf_{x \in X} F(x,0) </math>
:<math> D_0 := \sup_{v \in U^*} -F^*(0,v) </math>
:<math> D_0 := \sup_{v \in U^*} -F^*(0,v) </math>


The formulation of these problems becomes even simpler from the perspective of the ''inf-projection'' <math> P(u) := \inf_{x} F(x,u) </math>. With this notation, the primal and dual problems are given by


:<math> P_0 = P(0)</math>
:<math> D_0 =P^{**}(0) </math>
Therefore, by the Fenchel-Moreau theorem, a sufficient condition for equivalence of the primal and dual problems is that the inf-projetion function ''P(u)'' is convex and lower semicontinuous.


==References==
==References==
<references>
<references>
<ref name="Brezis">H. Brezis, ''Functional Analysis'', Chapter 1.</ref>
<ref name="Brezis">[https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-70914-7 H. Brezis, ''Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces, and Partial Differential Equations'', Chapter 1.]</ref>
<ref name="Rockafellar">Rockafellar, ''Convex Analysis''.</ref>
<ref name="Rockafellar">[https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3 R. T. Rockafellar and R. J-B. Wets, ''Variational Analysis'', Chapter 11.]</ref>
</references>
</references>

Latest revision as of 04:39, 28 February 2022

The Fenchel-Moreau Theorem[1] is a fundamental result in convex analysis, characterizing the class of functions for which a function equals its biconjugate. A key consequence of this theorem is that is provides sufficient conditions for the equivalence of primal and dual optimization problems.[2]

Fenchel-Moreau Theorem

Given a normed vector space X and , then

Background on Convex Conjugate Functions

Let X be a normed vector space, and let X* denote its topological dual. Given an extended real-valued function , its convex conjugate is defined by

An immediate consequence of this definition is Young's Inequality,

Furthermore, it follows directly from the definition that, for any function f, its conjugate function f* is convex and lower semicontinuous.

In a similar way, for any function f, its the biconjugate function is defined by

As above, the biconjugate function f** is always convex and lower semicontinuous. Furthermore, by a second application of Young's inequality, we have

Since f** is always convex and lower semicontinuous, in order for equality to hold for all x, it is necessary that f also be convex and lower semicontinuous. The heart of Fenchel-Moreau Theorem is that this condition is not just necessary, but sufficient.

Application to Primal/Dual Optimization Problems

An important consequence of the Fenchel-Moreau Theorem is that it provides sufficient conditions for the equivalence of primal and dual optimization problems. Given a normed vector space X and a lower semicontinuous, convex function , the primal optimization problem is given by

The corresponding dual problem arises from a suitable ``perturbation" of the primal problem, subject to a parameter uU, where U is also a normed vector space. In particular, let be a proper convex function so that . Then the corresponding primal and dual problems may be written as

The formulation of these problems becomes even simpler from the perspective of the inf-projection . With this notation, the primal and dual problems are given by

Therefore, by the Fenchel-Moreau theorem, a sufficient condition for equivalence of the primal and dual problems is that the inf-projetion function P(u) is convex and lower semicontinuous.

References