Dominated Convergence Theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In measure theory, the dominated convergence theorem is a cornerstone of Lebesgue integration. It can be viewed as a culmination of all efforts, and is a general statement about the interplay between limits and integrals. | In measure theory, the dominated convergence theorem is a cornerstone of Lebesgue integration. It can be viewed as a culmination of all efforts, and is a general statement about the interplay between limits and integrals. | ||
==Theorem | ==Statement Theorem== | ||
Consider the measure space <math> (X,\mathcal{M},\lambda) </math>. Suppose <math>\{f_n\}</math> is a sequence in <math>L^1(\lambda)</math> such that | Consider the measure space <math> (X,\mathcal{M},\lambda) </math>. Suppose <math>\{f_n\}</math> is a sequence in <math>L^1(\lambda)</math> such that | ||
# <math>f_n \to f</math> a.e | # <math>f_n \to f</math> a.e | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
# Suppose we want to compute <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_{[0, 1]} \frac{1 + nx^2}{(1 + x^2)^n} </math>. <ref name="Folland2">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §2.3.28 </ref> Denote the integrand <math>f_n</math> and see that <math>|f_n| \leq 1</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math> and $1_{[0, 1]} \in L^1(\lambda)$. Note we only consider the constant function $1$ on $[0, 1]$. Applying the dominated convergence theorem, this allows us the move the limit inside the integral and compute it as usual. | # Suppose we want to compute <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_{[0, 1]} \frac{1 + nx^2}{(1 + x^2)^n} </math>. <ref name="Folland2">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §2.3.28 </ref> Denote the integrand <math>f_n</math> and see that <math>|f_n| \leq 1</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math> and $1_{[0, 1]} \in L^1(\lambda)$. Note we only consider the constant function $1$ on $[0, 1]$. Applying the dominated convergence theorem, this allows us the move the limit inside the integral and compute it as usual. | ||
# Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence | # Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence <math>f_n</math> defined by <math>f_n(x) = n1_{[0, \frac{1}{n}]}</math> because <math>f_n \to 0</math> pointwise everywhere and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \int f_n = 1 \neq 0 = \int \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n </math>. <ref>Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A Lecture 15''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | ||
==Another Application: Stirling's Formula== | |||
Stirling's formula states that <math display="block"> n! \sim \sqrt{2\pi n} n^ne^{-n} </math> as <math> n\rightarrow \infty </math>. We offer a proof here which relies on the Dominated Convergence Theorem. | |||
''Proof:'' Repeated integration by parts yields the formula | |||
<math display="block"> n!= \int_0^\infty t^ne^{-t}\ dt</math> | |||
We shall estimate the integral above. Making the variable change <math> t=n+s </math> yields | |||
<math display="block"> \int_{-n}^\infty (n+s)^ne^{-n-s}\ ds </math> Simplifying, this becomes | |||
<math display="block"> n^ne^{-n}\int_{-n}^\infty \left(1+\frac{s}{n}\right)^ne^{-s}\ ds</math> | |||
Combining the integrand into a single exponential, | |||
<math display="block> n^ne^{-n}\int_{-n}^\infty \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{s}{n}\right) -s \right)\ ds</math> | |||
We want to show that this integral is asymptotic to the Gaussian. To this end, make the scaling substitution <math> s= \sqrt{n}x </math> to obtain | |||
<math display="block"> \sqrt{n}n^ne^{-n}\int_{-\sqrt{n}}^\infty \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\ dx</math> | |||
Since the function <math> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) </math> equals zero and has derivative <math> \sqrt{n} </math> at the origin, and has second derivative <math> \frac{-1}{(1+x/\sqrt{n})^2}</math>, applying the fundamental theorem of calculus twice yields | |||
<math display="block> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x = -\int_0^x \frac{x-y}{1+y/\sqrt{n}}\ dy </math> As a consequence we have the upper bounds | |||
<math display="block> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -cx^2 </math> for some <math> c>0 </math> when <math> x\leq \sqrt{n} </math> and | |||
<math display="block"> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -c|x|\sqrt{n} </math> | |||
when <math> |x| > \sqrt{n} </math>. These bounds keep the exponential in the integrand <math> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right) </math> bounded by an <math> L^1 </math> function. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, | |||
<math display="block"> \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-\sqrt{n}}^\infty \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\ dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right)\ dx </math> where the pointwise convergence | |||
<math display="block"> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\rightarrow \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right) </math> can be arrived at for all <math> x </math> by expanding the Taylor series of the logarithm. The final integral is a classic calculus integral which can be computed to equal <math> \sqrt{2\pi} </math>. This proves Stirling's formula. See <ref> Tao, Terence. [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/254a-notes-0a-stirlings-formula/#point ''254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula'']. What's New, 2 January 2010.</ref> for a more motivated account of this proof. | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 23:35, 19 December 2020
In measure theory, the dominated convergence theorem is a cornerstone of Lebesgue integration. It can be viewed as a culmination of all efforts, and is a general statement about the interplay between limits and integrals.
Statement Theorem
Consider the measure space . Suppose is a sequence in such that
- a.e
- there exists such that a.e. for all
Then and . [1]
Proof of Theorem
is a measurable function in the sense that it is a.e. equal to a measurable function, since it is the limit of except on a null set. Also a.e., so .
Now we have a.e. and a.e. to which we may apply Fatou's lemma to obtain
,
where the equalities follow from linearity of the integral and the inequality follows from Fatou's lemma. We similarly obtain
.
Since , these imply
from which the result follows. [1] [2]
Applications of Theorem
- Suppose we want to compute . [3] Denote the integrand and see that for all and $1_{[0, 1]} \in L^1(\lambda)$. Note we only consider the constant function $1$ on $[0, 1]$. Applying the dominated convergence theorem, this allows us the move the limit inside the integral and compute it as usual.
- Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence defined by because pointwise everywhere and . [4]
Another Application: Stirling's Formula
Stirling's formula states that
Proof: Repeated integration by parts yields the formula
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3
- ↑ Craig, Katy. MATH 201A Lecture 15. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.
- ↑ Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3.28
- ↑ Craig, Katy. MATH 201A Lecture 15. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.
- ↑ Tao, Terence. 254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula. What's New, 2 January 2010.