Cantor Function: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
AdityaMohan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Cantor Function Alternative== | ==Cantor Function Alternative== | ||
The Cantor Function can be constructed iteratively using homework construction. | The Cantor Function can be constructed iteratively using homework construction.<ref name="Craig">Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A HW 5''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | ||
==Measurable function with pre-image of Lebesgue measurable set not Lebesgue measurable== | |||
Define <math> f(x)= \begin{cases} | |||
\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2b_n}{3^n}, & x = \sum_{n=1}^\infty | |||
\frac{b_n}{2^n}\ \mathrm{for}\ b_n\in\{0,1\} | |||
\\ 0\ \mathrm{otherwise} \\ \end{cases} | |||
</math> | |||
Then it can be shown <math> f(x) </math> is the pointwise limit of simple functions. However f takes values in the cantor set on the set of non terminating decimals. We can find a non measurable set <math>F</math> such that <math>E:=f(F)</math> is a null set and thus lebesgue measurable. Therefore <math>f^{-1}(E)</math> fails to be Lebesgue measurable despite E being measurable. | |||
This is analogous to the construction in HW5 2d) to 2 g) and is useful for motivating the definition of the Lebesgue measurable functions to be <math>(\mathcal{L}, \mathcal{B}_{\overline{\mathbb{R}}})</math> measurable | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
1. Terence Tao, An introduction to measure theory |
Latest revision as of 03:22, 19 December 2020
Cantor ternary Function
if is the Cantor set on [0,1], then the Cantor function c : [0,1] → [0,1] can be defined as[1]
Properties of Cantor Functions
- Cantor Function is continuous everywhere, zero derivative almost everywhere.
- lack of absolute continuity.
- Monotonicity
- Its value goes from 0 to 1 as its argument reaches from 0 to 1.
Cantor Function Alternative
The Cantor Function can be constructed iteratively using homework construction.[2]
Measurable function with pre-image of Lebesgue measurable set not Lebesgue measurable
Define
Then it can be shown is the pointwise limit of simple functions. However f takes values in the cantor set on the set of non terminating decimals. We can find a non measurable set such that is a null set and thus lebesgue measurable. Therefore fails to be Lebesgue measurable despite E being measurable.
This is analogous to the construction in HW5 2d) to 2 g) and is useful for motivating the definition of the Lebesgue measurable functions to be measurable
References
1. Terence Tao, An introduction to measure theory