Semidiscrete Optimal Transport: Difference between revisions
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
where <math> \mu, \nu </math> denote probability measures on domains <math> X, Y </math> respectively, and <math> c(x,y) </math> is a cost function defined over <math> X \times Y </math>. <math> R(c) </math> denotes the set of possible dual potentials, and the condition that <math> \varphi(x) + \psi(y) \leq c(x,y) </math> is satisfied. Now, we would like to extend this notion of the dual problem to the semidiscrete case. Such a case can be reformulated as | where <math> \mu, \nu </math> denote probability measures on domains <math> X, Y </math> respectively, and <math> c(x,y) </math> is a cost function defined over <math> X \times Y </math>. <math> R(c) </math> denotes the set of possible dual potentials, and the condition that <math> \varphi(x) + \psi(y) \leq c(x,y) </math> is satisfied. Now, we would like to extend this notion of the dual problem to the semidiscrete case. Such a case can be reformulated as | ||
<math display="block"> \ | <math display="block"> \max_{\varphi \in \R^m} \Big\{ \int_X \varphi^c d\mu + \sum_j \varphi_j b_j \Big\} </math> |
Revision as of 04:38, 2 June 2020
Semidiscrete optimal transport refers to situations in optimal transport where two input measures are considered, and one measure is a discrete measure and the other one is continuous. Hence, because only one of the two measures is discrete, we arrive at the appropriate name "semidiscrete."
Formulation of the Semidiscrete Dual Problem
In particular, we will examine semidiscrete optimal transport in the case of the dual problem. The general dual problem for continuous measures can be stated as
where denote probability measures on domains respectively, and is a cost function defined over . denotes the set of possible dual potentials, and the condition that is satisfied. Now, we would like to extend this notion of the dual problem to the semidiscrete case. Such a case can be reformulated as