Dominated Convergence Theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
# Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence <math>f_n</math> defined by <math>f_n(x) = n1_{[0, \frac{1}{n}]}</math> because <math>f_n \to 0</math> pointwise everywhere and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \int f_n = 1 \neq 0 = \int \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n </math>. <ref>Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A Lecture 15''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | # Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence <math>f_n</math> defined by <math>f_n(x) = n1_{[0, \frac{1}{n}]}</math> because <math>f_n \to 0</math> pointwise everywhere and <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \int f_n = 1 \neq 0 = \int \lim_{n \to \infty} f_n </math>. <ref>Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A Lecture 15''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | ||
==Another Application: | ==Another Application: Stirling's Formula== | ||
Stirling's formula states that <math display="block"> n! \sim \sqrt{2\pi n} n^ne^{-n} </math> as <math> n\rightarrow \infty </math>. We offer a proof here which relies on the Dominated Convergence Theorem. | Stirling's formula states that <math display="block"> n! \sim \sqrt{2\pi n} n^ne^{-n} </math> as <math> n\rightarrow \infty </math>. We offer a proof here which relies on the Dominated Convergence Theorem. | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
<math display="block> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -cx^2 </math> for some <math> c>0 </math> when <math> x\leq \sqrt{n} </math> and | <math display="block> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -cx^2 </math> for some <math> c>0 </math> when <math> x\leq \sqrt{n} </math> and | ||
<math display="block"> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -c|x|\sqrt{n} </math> | <math display="block"> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -c|x|\sqrt{n} </math> | ||
when <math> |x| > \sqrt{n} </math>. These bounds keep the exponential in the integrand <math> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right) </math> bounded by an <math> L^1 </math> function. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, | |||
<math display="block"> \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-\sqrt{n}}^\infty \exp(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\ dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right)\ dx </math> where the pointwise convergence | <math display="block"> \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-\sqrt{n}}^\infty \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\ dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right)\ dx </math> where the pointwise convergence | ||
<math display="block"> \exp(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\rightarrow \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right) </math> can be arrived at for all <math> x </math> by expanding the Taylor series of the logarithm. The final integral is a classic calculus integral which can be computed to equal <math> \sqrt{2\pi} </math>. This proves Stirling's formula. See <ref>Tao, Terence. ''254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula''. What's New, 2 January 2010.</ref> for a more motivated account of this proof. | <math display="block"> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\rightarrow \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right) </math> can be arrived at for all <math> x </math> by expanding the Taylor series of the logarithm. The final integral is a classic calculus integral which can be computed to equal <math> \sqrt{2\pi} </math>. This proves Stirling's formula. See <ref> Tao, Terence. [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/01/02/254a-notes-0a-stirlings-formula/#point ''254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula'']. What's New, 2 January 2010.</ref> for a more motivated account of this proof. | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 23:35, 19 December 2020
In measure theory, the dominated convergence theorem is a cornerstone of Lebesgue integration. It can be viewed as a culmination of all efforts, and is a general statement about the interplay between limits and integrals.
Statement Theorem
Consider the measure space . Suppose is a sequence in such that
- a.e
- there exists such that a.e. for all
Then and . [1]
Proof of Theorem
is a measurable function in the sense that it is a.e. equal to a measurable function, since it is the limit of except on a null set. Also a.e., so .
Now we have a.e. and a.e. to which we may apply Fatou's lemma to obtain
,
where the equalities follow from linearity of the integral and the inequality follows from Fatou's lemma. We similarly obtain
.
Since , these imply
from which the result follows. [1] [2]
Applications of Theorem
- Suppose we want to compute . [3] Denote the integrand and see that for all and $1_{[0, 1]} \in L^1(\lambda)$. Note we only consider the constant function $1$ on $[0, 1]$. Applying the dominated convergence theorem, this allows us the move the limit inside the integral and compute it as usual.
- Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence defined by because pointwise everywhere and . [4]
Another Application: Stirling's Formula
Stirling's formula states that
Proof: Repeated integration by parts yields the formula
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3
- ↑ Craig, Katy. MATH 201A Lecture 15. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.
- ↑ Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3.28
- ↑ Craig, Katy. MATH 201A Lecture 15. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.
- ↑ Tao, Terence. 254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula. What's New, 2 January 2010.