|
|
Line 44: |
Line 44: |
| <math display="block> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -cx^2 </math> for some <math> c>0 </math> when <math> x\leq \sqrt{n} </math> and | | <math display="block> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -cx^2 </math> for some <math> c>0 </math> when <math> x\leq \sqrt{n} </math> and |
| <math display="block"> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -c|x|\sqrt{n} </math> | | <math display="block"> n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right)-\sqrt{n}x \leq -c|x|\sqrt{n} </math> |
| when <math> |x| > \sqrt{n} </math>. These bounds keep the exponential in the integrand <math> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right) </math> bounded by an <math> L_1 </math> function. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, | | when <math> |x| > \sqrt{n} </math>. These bounds keep the exponential in the integrand <math> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right) </math> bounded by an <math> L^1 </math> function. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, |
| <math display="block"> \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-\sqrt{n}}^\infty \exp(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\ dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right)\ dx </math> where the pointwise convergence | | <math display="block"> \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_{-\sqrt{n}}^\infty \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\ dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right)\ dx </math> where the pointwise convergence |
| <math display="block"> \exp(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\rightarrow \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right) </math> can be arrived at for all <math> x </math> by expanding the Taylor series of the logarithm. The final integral is a classic calculus integral which can be computed to equal <math> \sqrt{2\pi} </math>. This proves Stirling's formula. See <ref>Tao, Terence. ''254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula''. What's New, 2 January 2010.</ref> for a more motivated account of this proof. | | <math display="block"> \exp\left(n\log\left(1+\frac{x}{\sqrt{n}}\right) -\sqrt{n}x \right)\rightarrow \exp\left(-\frac{x^2}{2}\right) </math> can be arrived at for all <math> x </math> by expanding the Taylor series of the logarithm. The final integral is a classic calculus integral which can be computed to equal <math> \sqrt{2\pi} </math>. This proves Stirling's formula. See <ref>Tao, Terence. ''254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula''. What's New, 2 January 2010.</ref> for a more motivated account of this proof. |
|
| |
|
| ==References== | | ==References== |
In measure theory, the dominated convergence theorem is a cornerstone of Lebesgue integration. It can be viewed as a culmination of all efforts, and is a general statement about the interplay between limits and integrals.
Statement Theorem
Consider the measure space . Suppose is a sequence in such that
- a.e
- there exists such that a.e. for all
Then and . [1]
Proof of Theorem
is a measurable function in the sense that it is a.e. equal to a measurable function, since it is the limit of except on a null set. Also a.e., so .
Now we have a.e. and a.e. to which we may apply Fatou's lemma to obtain
,
where the equalities follow from linearity of the integral and the inequality follows from Fatou's lemma. We similarly obtain
.
Since , these imply
from which the result follows. [1] [2]
Applications of Theorem
- Suppose we want to compute . [3] Denote the integrand and see that for all and $1_{[0, 1]} \in L^1(\lambda)$. Note we only consider the constant function $1$ on $[0, 1]$. Applying the dominated convergence theorem, this allows us the move the limit inside the integral and compute it as usual.
- Using the theorem, we know there does not exist a dominating function for the sequence defined by because pointwise everywhere and . [4]
Another Application: Proof of Stirling's Formula
Stirling's formula states that
as
. We offer a proof here which relies on the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
Proof: Repeated integration by parts yields the formula
We shall estimate the integral above. Making the variable change
yields
Simplifying, this becomes
Combining the integrand into a single exponential,
We want to show that this integral is asymptotic to the Gaussian. To this end, make the scaling substitution
to obtain
Since the function
equals zero and has derivative
at the origin, and has second derivative
, applying the fundamental theorem of calculus twice yields
As a consequence we have the upper bounds
for some
when
and
when
. These bounds keep the exponential in the integrand
bounded by an
function. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem,
where the pointwise convergence
can be arrived at for all
by expanding the Taylor series of the logarithm. The final integral is a classic calculus integral which can be computed to equal
. This proves Stirling's formula. See
[5] for a more motivated account of this proof.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3
- ↑ Craig, Katy. MATH 201A Lecture 15. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.
- ↑ Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition, §2.3.28
- ↑ Craig, Katy. MATH 201A Lecture 15. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.
- ↑ Tao, Terence. 254A, Notes 0a: Stirling's Formula. What's New, 2 January 2010.