Convergence in Measure: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Blainequack (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Let <math>(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)<math> denote a measure space and let <math>f_n, f : X \to \mathbb{R}<math> for <math>n \in \mathbb{N}<math>. The sequence <math>\{f_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}<math> converges to <math>f<math> in measure if <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \mu \left( \{x \in X : |f_n(x) - f(x)| \geq \epsilon \} \right) = 0<math> for any <math>\epsilon > 0<math>. | Let <math>(X, \mathcal{M}, \mu)</math> denote a measure space and let <math>f_n, f : X \to \mathbb{R}</math> for <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>. The sequence <math>\{f_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}}</math> converges to <math>f</math> in measure if <math>\lim_{n \to \infty} \mu \left( \{x \in X : |f_n(x) - f(x)| \geq \epsilon \} \right) = 0</math> for any <math>\epsilon > 0</math>. Furthermore, the sequence <math> \{f_n\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} </math> is Cauchy in measure if for every <math> \epsilon > 0, </math> <math> \mu(\{x \in X : |f_n(x) - f_m(x) | \geq \epsilon \}) \to 0 </math> as <math> n,m \to \infty </math> <ref name="Folland">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §2.4 </ref> | ||
==Properties== | |||
*If <math> f_n \to f </math> in measure and <math> g_n \to g </math> in measure, then <math> f_n+g_n \to f+g </math> in measure.<ref name="Craig">Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A HW 8''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | |||
*If <math> f_n \to f </math> in measure and <math> g_n \to g </math> in measure, then <math> f_ng_n \to fg </math> in measure if this is a finite measure space. <ref name="Craig">Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A HW 8''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | |||
==Relation to other types of Convergence== | |||
*If <math> f_n \to f</math> in <math> L^1(\mu) </math> then <math> f_n \to f </math> in measure <ref name="Folland">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §2.4 </ref> | |||
*If <math> f_n \to f </math> in measure, then there exists a subsequence <math> \{f_{n_k}\}_{k \in \mathbb{N}} </math> such that <math> f_{n_k} \to f </math> almost everywhere.<ref name="Folland">Gerald B. Folland, ''Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, second edition'', §2.4 </ref> | |||
*If <math> \mu(X) < \infty </math> and <math> f_n,f </math> measurable s.t. <math> f_n \to f </math> almost everywhere Then <math> f_n \to f </math> in measure.<ref name="Craig, Katy">Craig, Katy. ''MATH 201A Lecture 18''. UC Santa Barbara, Fall 2020.</ref> | |||
==References== |
Latest revision as of 07:18, 17 December 2020
Let denote a measure space and let for . The sequence converges to in measure if for any . Furthermore, the sequence is Cauchy in measure if for every as [1]
Properties
- If in measure and in measure, then in measure.[2]
- If in measure and in measure, then in measure if this is a finite measure space. [2]
Relation to other types of Convergence
- If in then in measure [1]
- If in measure, then there exists a subsequence such that almost everywhere.[1]
- If and measurable s.t. almost everywhere Then in measure.[3]