|
|
Line 45: |
Line 45: |
| and by monotonicity, | | and by monotonicity, |
|
| |
|
| <math> = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \mu^*( A \cap B_i) + \mu^*(A \cap (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i)^c) </math> | | <math> = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \mu^*( A \cap B_i) + \mu^*(A \cap (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i)^c) .</math> |
| | |
| | Since this holds for all <math> n </math>, |
| | |
| | <math> /mu^*(A) \geq \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu^*( A \cap B_i) + \mu^*(A \cap (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i)^c) </math> |
Statement
Consider an out measure on . Define
.
Then is a -algebra and is a measure on .
Proof
First, observe that is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of -measurability. Now, we show if then .
Suppose . Then
and by subadditivity
But certainly, since the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude
hence and we have is an algebra.
Now, suppose and are disjoint. Then
so is finitely additive.
Next, we show is closed under countable disjoint unions. Given a disjoint sequence of sets , for all , by countable subadditivity,
It remains to show the other inequality direction. Since is closed under finite unions, . By using the definition of -measurability,
and by monotonicity,
Since this holds for all ,