Caratheodory's Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<math> \mu^*(A) \leq \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu^*( A \cup B_i) + \mu^*(A \cap (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i)^c) .</math> | <math> \mu^*(A) \leq \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \mu^*( A \cup B_i) + \mu^*(A \cap (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i)^c) .</math> | ||
It remains to show the other inequality direction. Since <math> \mathcal{M} </math> is closed under finite unions, <math> \cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i \in \mathcal{M} </math>. By using the definition of <math> \mu </math>-measurability, | |||
<math> \mu^*(A) = \mu^*( A \cup (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i) ) + \mu^*(A \cap (\cup_{i=1}^{\infty} B_i)^c) </math> |
Revision as of 22:57, 16 December 2020
Statement
Consider an out measure on . Define
.
Then is a -algebra and is a measure on .
Proof
First, observe that is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of -measurability. Now, we show if then .
Suppose . Then
and by subadditivity
But certainly, since the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude
hence and we have is an algebra.
Now, suppose and are disjoint. Then
so is finitely additive.
Next, we show is closed under countable disjoint unions. Given a disjoint sequence of sets , for all , by countable subadditivity,
It remains to show the other inequality direction. Since is closed under finite unions, . By using the definition of -measurability,