Caratheodory's Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Andrewgracyk (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
First, observe that <math>\mathcal{M}</math> is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of <math> \mu </math>-measurability. Now, we show if <math> A, B </math> then <math> A \cup B \in \mathcal{M} </math>. | First, observe that <math>\mathcal{M}</math> is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of <math> \mu </math>-measurability. Now, we show if <math> A, B </math> then <math> A \cup B \in \mathcal{M} </math>. | ||
Suppose <math>E \subseteq X </math>. Then | |||
<math> \mu^*(E) = \mu^*(E \cap A) = \mu^*(E \cap A^c) </math> | <math> \mu^*(E) = \mu^*(E \cap A) = \mu^*(E \cap A^c) </math> | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<math> \geq \mu^*(E \cap A^c \cap B^c) + \mu^*(E \cap (A \cup B)) </math> | <math> \geq \mu^*(E \cap A^c \cap B^c) + \mu^*(E \cap (A \cup B)) </math> | ||
But certainly, since <math> E \subseteq ( E\cap(A \cup B) ) \cup (E \cap (A \cup B)^c) </math> the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude | |||
<math> E = </math> |
Revision as of 22:40, 16 December 2020
Statement
Consider an out measure on . Define
.
Then is a -algebra and is a measure on .
Proof
First, observe that is closed under complements due to symmetry in the meaning of -measurability. Now, we show if then .
Suppose . Then
and by subadditivity
But certainly, since the inequality in the other direction also holds, and we conclude