Talk:Geodesics and generalized geodesics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Discussion Geodesics) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Geodesics in general metric spaces== | |||
* Consider either defining L(w), for a general metric space, or linking to a page with the definition. | |||
* ``it is natural to think of Riemannian structure. It can be FORMALLY defined.'' | |||
* Remove the ``for p>1''. The fact that geodesics are absolutely continuous curves is true for all p. | |||
* If you would like to include the p in the equation \int_0^1 |c'(t)|^p... you should introduce the W_p metric first. | |||
==Statement of Theorem== | |||
* Consider changing the name of this section to ``dynamic formulation of Wasserstein distance''. | |||
* Remove the requirement p>1; W_1 is also a geodesic space | |||
* Also, there is a small type-o in the continuity equation: it should be the divergence operator \nabla \cdot, instead of the gradient operator \nabla. | |||
Revision as of 03:59, 12 June 2020
Geodesics in general metric spaces
- Consider either defining L(w), for a general metric space, or linking to a page with the definition.
- ``it is natural to think of Riemannian structure. It can be FORMALLY defined.
- Remove the ``for p>1. The fact that geodesics are absolutely continuous curves is true for all p.
- If you would like to include the p in the equation \int_0^1 |c'(t)|^p... you should introduce the W_p metric first.
Statement of Theorem
- Consider changing the name of this section to ``dynamic formulation of Wasserstein distance.
- Remove the requirement p>1; W_1 is also a geodesic space
- Also, there is a small type-o in the continuity equation: it should be the divergence operator \nabla \cdot, instead of the gradient operator \nabla.